In the event the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only accomplished If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with the petitioner company responded into the allegations as such they were nicely aware about the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority to some civil servant without the actual duration of service nearly violates the entire service framework as being a civil servant inducted in Quality 17 by claiming such benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher grade, which is neither the intention of your law nor with the equity. Read more
In that sense, case legislation differs from one jurisdiction to another. For example, a case in Ny would not be decided using case legislation from California. In its place, New York courts will review the issue relying on binding precedent . If no previous decisions within the issue exist, Ny courts may well take a look at precedents from a different jurisdiction, that would be persuasive authority somewhat than binding authority. Other factors for example how outdated the decision is and also the closeness to the facts will affect the authority of a specific case in common regulation.
The an abundance of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made distinct that police is free to get action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities matter to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In the event the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-industry duties in the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), and the petitioners may perhaps find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
The proposal is apparently reasonable and acceded to. In the meantime police shall remain neutral inside the private dispute between the parties, however, if any of your individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall just take prompt action against them under regulation. five. The instant petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Within the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is the highest court while in the United States. Lessen courts within the federal level consist of the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, along with the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related towards the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that entail parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each individual state has its have judicial system that includes trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every state is frequently referred to given that the “supreme” court, Whilst there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state legislation and regulations, Though state courts can also generally hear cases involving federal laws.
The law as set up in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
In a few jurisdictions, case legislation may be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of your police is always to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, make sure law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, but they have did not have any corrective effect on it.
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation on the police, and they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its different pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are required to protect rather than abduct. Read more
In 1997, the boy was placed into the home of John and Jane Roe as a foster child. Although the pair experienced two younger children of their have at home, the social worker did not convey to them about the boy’s history of both being abused, and abusing other children. When she made her report on the court the following working day, the worker reported the boy’s placement while in the Roe’s home, but didn’t mention that the pair had younger children.
seventeen . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I website intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) in the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession of your subjected premises to your petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance into the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.